<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where ND Stands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tgiab.com/2009/10/19/where-nd-stands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tgiab.com/2009/10/19/where-nd-stands/</link>
	<description>Talking Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndgravy</title>
		<link>http://tgiab.com/2009/10/19/where-nd-stands/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ndgravy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tgiab.com/?p=1628#comment-1221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just some food for thought about CW.  This comes from Blue Gray Sky, which I like because it is mostly levelheaded analysis of the team and coaches.  Here&#039;s the link and the important two paragraphs that comes up at the end (http://bluegraysky.blogspot.com/2009_10_01_archive.html#8947359072948584685):

&quot;It seems that fans are starting to really dig in for a protracted argument about whether Charlie will be back next year or if he&#039;ll be let go. However, while mulling the topic on the flight home, I think much of the current debate is largely wasted bandwidth and ink. Nearly all angles have been exhausted and at this point much of the discussion is the equivalent of shouting past each other. With the team already saddled with two losses, the results on the field the rest of the season should make the decision about Charlie largely obvious. Either the team will build off the late rally against the Trojans, play up to their ability the rest of the season, and run the table, or perform a redux of the second half of 2008 and drop a few clearly winnable games against teams with inferior talent.

We all hope that Jack Swarbrick is performing any and all necessary due diligence to prepare for a coaching change, if needed. At the same time, Charlie&#039;s fate still rests solely in his hands: there are six games left to play. Let&#039;s just hold off on the hard and fast conclusions for a bit and see where he takes us over the next few weeks. By then we should know what the next steps should be and can all move in that direction together.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just some food for thought about CW.  This comes from Blue Gray Sky, which I like because it is mostly levelheaded analysis of the team and coaches.  Here&#8217;s the link and the important two paragraphs that comes up at the end (<a href="http://bluegraysky.blogspot.com/2009_10_01_archive.html#8947359072948584685" rel="nofollow">http://bluegraysky.blogspot.com/2009_10_01_archive.html#8947359072948584685</a>):</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems that fans are starting to really dig in for a protracted argument about whether Charlie will be back next year or if he&#8217;ll be let go. However, while mulling the topic on the flight home, I think much of the current debate is largely wasted bandwidth and ink. Nearly all angles have been exhausted and at this point much of the discussion is the equivalent of shouting past each other. With the team already saddled with two losses, the results on the field the rest of the season should make the decision about Charlie largely obvious. Either the team will build off the late rally against the Trojans, play up to their ability the rest of the season, and run the table, or perform a redux of the second half of 2008 and drop a few clearly winnable games against teams with inferior talent.</p>
<p>We all hope that Jack Swarbrick is performing any and all necessary due diligence to prepare for a coaching change, if needed. At the same time, Charlie&#8217;s fate still rests solely in his hands: there are six games left to play. Let&#8217;s just hold off on the hard and fast conclusions for a bit and see where he takes us over the next few weeks. By then we should know what the next steps should be and can all move in that direction together.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndgravy</title>
		<link>http://tgiab.com/2009/10/19/where-nd-stands/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ndgravy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tgiab.com/?p=1628#comment-1220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/10/17/its-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-irish/#cont

In case anyone hasn&#039;t seen it, I&#039;ve been really enjoying reading John Walters&#039; blog.  I think he does a pretty good job covering the Irish, so I thought I&#039;d make sure everyone here saw what he had to say about the USC game (as well as giving some insight into his thoughts on the team in general and a link to the real blog).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/10/17/its-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-irish/#cont" rel="nofollow">http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2009/10/17/its-deja-vu-all-over-again-for-irish/#cont</a></p>
<p>In case anyone hasn&#8217;t seen it, I&#8217;ve been really enjoying reading John Walters&#8217; blog.  I think he does a pretty good job covering the Irish, so I thought I&#8217;d make sure everyone here saw what he had to say about the USC game (as well as giving some insight into his thoughts on the team in general and a link to the real blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

